Jump to section (12)
Donors give because giving makes them feel effective, connected, and consistent with who they are. Guilt raises a first gift and loses the second. Show the donor the change they created, name them as the cause of it, and make the next opportunity feel like continuing something rather than covering a shortfall.
Key Takeaways
- 1Giving activates the same neural reward circuitry as receiving money (Harbaugh, Mayr and Burghart, Science, 2007). The joy is biological, not metaphorical.
- 2Spending on others produces measurable happiness gains across 136 countries (Aknin et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013).
- 3Donor retention sits at 42.6% sector-wide and first-time donor retention at 19.1% (AFP Fundraising Effectiveness Project, 2024). Most donors leave because they never felt connected to why they gave.
- 4The eight mechanisms model (Bekkers and Wiepking, 2011) shows that motivation, not solicitation skill, is the strongest predictor of repeat giving.
- 5A fundraiser's first job is to surface and reinforce the donor's own reason for giving. Stewardship that names the motive outperforms generic thanks at almost every retention benchmark.
The quick version: Donors do not give because you wrote a good appeal. They give because giving connects them to something true about who they are. Twenty years of philanthropy and behavioural science research, from the Harbaugh fMRI studies to the AFP retention data, point to the same conclusion: a fundraiser's first job is helping the donor recognise, name, and act on their own motivation. Everything else is logistics.
The joy is real, and it is biological
In 2007, William Harbaugh, Ulrich Mayr and Daniel Burghart published a study in Science that tracked brain activity while money moved to a food bank. Both receiving money and giving it away activated the brain's reward centres, the caudate nucleus and the nucleus accumbens. The team called this "neural evidence for the warm glow."
A year later, Elizabeth Dunn, Lara Aknin and Michael Norton published a parallel behavioural study in Science showing that spending a windfall on others produced higher end-of-day happiness than spending on oneself. Aknin later replicated the finding across 136 countries in a 2013 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology paper. The result held even in low-income contexts.
The donor is not doing you a favour. They are accessing a reliable source of well-being. Your job is to make that access easy, honest, and repeatable.
Giving is not a sacrifice the donor makes for the cause. It is a reward the cause makes possible for the donor. -- SA Philanthropy
Motivation is the variable that actually predicts loyalty
If giving feels good, why does the sector lose half its donors annually?
The AFP Fundraising Effectiveness Project's 2024 quarterly report puts overall donor retention at 42.6% and new-donor retention at 19.1%. Four out of five first-time donors do not return. Total donor counts have fallen for several years, a pattern we addressed in the dollars-up, donors-down piece.
Most charities respond by trying to optimize the ask. They focus on subject lines and copy when they should focus on why the donor showed up.
René Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking's literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy analyzed over 500 studies to find eight mechanisms driving giving:
1. Awareness of need
2. Solicitation
3. Costs and benefits
4. Altruism
5. Reputation
6. Psychological benefits (the warm glow)
7. Values
8. Efficacy
Only one of these is an action the fundraiser takes. The other seven belong to the donor. Retained donors are those whose internal motivations are named and reinforced. Lapsed donors are usually those asked for money again before anyone learned why they gave in the first place.
Penelope Burk's Donor-Centered Fundraising research confirms this. Donors report they would give more if charities acknowledged gifts promptly, explained impact, and treated them as individuals. These actions require curiosity, not a large budget.
What "connecting donors to their motivation" looks like in practice
A fundraiser must help the donor stay close to the reason they care.
1. Ask the motive question early and write the answer down
The most useful question in discovery is asking what made the cause matter to the donor.
The Lilly Family School of Philanthropy's Women Give and Giving Environment research series finds that donors who articulate a personal story of connection give more. Whether the connection is a parent’s profession or growing up near the charity, the detail must be recorded in the CRM and used in future communications. The principles in the power of listening in donor relationships apply here. Motivation surfaces when you stop pitching and start listening.
2. Reflect the motive back in stewardship
Once you know a donor's "why," every touchpoint improves. An impact note for a donor honoring a family member should look different than one for a donor paying forward a service. Personalizing based on motive ensures stewardship never feels like a mass merge.
Adrian Sargeant and Stephen Lee's INSP donor commitment model identifies trust and shared beliefs as the strongest predictors of loyalty. Reflecting motive builds these qualities without needing a face-to-face meeting.
3. Treat the thank-you as the relationship, not the receipt
The AFP 2024 data shows that personalized acknowledgement workflows retain donors at higher rates. Penelope Burk found that a personal thank-you call within 48 hours significanty increased the likelihood and size of a second gift. A 90-second call is the highest-leverage action a small shop can take.
4. Build motive fields into the donor journey, not just the database
Motive data often dies in a notes field no one reads. It must be integrated into the donor journey itself. The welcome series should ask a motive question. The annual survey should allow for updates. Major gift discovery must require it. Motive should be the primary key for all engagement.
5. Use storytelling that lets the donor see themselves
Russell James's Inside the Mind of the Bequest Donor research found donors stay engaged with stories that frame them as the hero. Our storytelling guide explains how to structure this. If an impact report makes the donor feel generous and competent, it is successful. If it only praises the CEO, it has failed.
What this changes about how you spend your week
Your calendar should reflect these priorities.
A word on Islamic philanthropy and the joy of giving
Islamic philanthropy treated the joy of giving as essential to well-being long before modern science. In Islam, Zakat and Sadaqa are framing as benefits to the giver, serving as a means of purification and gratitude. The prophetic focus on niyyah, or intention, aligns with empirical findings.
Fundraisers who treat motive as central and steward Zakat with proper documentation are aligning with the donor's theological understanding. Our Zakat accreditation checklist outlines the operational side of this trust.
The shift, in one sentence
Instead of asking "how do I get this donor to give," ask: "how do I help this donor stay close to the reason they already want to give?"
The first question builds campaigns. The second builds long-term supporters.
If you need to audit your stewardship or train a team on discovery, the SA Philanthropy team manages these projects quarterly. Our resources library contains the templates we use.
Apply to the Waitlist to discuss a donor experience build for your organization.
Sources
1. Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U. and Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622-1625. science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1140738
2. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B. and Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687-1688. science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1150952
3. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E. and Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial Spending and Well-Being: Cross-Cultural Evidence for a Psychological Universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635-652. psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0031578
4. Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2011). A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924-973. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764010380927
5. Association of Fundraising Professionals and GivingTuesday Data Commons (2024). Fundraising Effectiveness Project: 2024 Quarterly Fundraising Report. AFP Global. afpglobal.org/FundraisingEffectivenessProject
6. Burk, P. (2003, updated editions). Donor-Centered Fundraising. Cygnus Applied Research. cygresearch.com/donor-centered-fundraising
7. Sargeant, A. and Lee, S. (2004). Donor Trust and Relationship Commitment in the UK Charity Sector: The Impact on Behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Wiley. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.198
8. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy (2023). The Giving Environment and Women Give research series. philanthropy.iupui.edu/research
9. James, R. N. (2018). Inside the Mind of the Bequest Donor: A Visual Presentation of the Neuroscience and Psychology of Effective Planned Giving Communication. encouragegenerosity.com
10. Giving USA Foundation (2024). Giving USA 2024: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2023. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. givingusa.org
Frequently Asked Questions
QIs the joy of giving a real, measurable thing?
Yes. The 2007 Harbaugh, Mayr and Burghart study in Science used fMRI to show that voluntary giving lights up the brain's caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens, the same reward regions activated by receiving money. Dunn, Aknin and Norton replicated the behavioural effect across cultures and income levels. Giving produces a documented, repeatable mood lift.
QIf giving feels good, why is donor retention so low?
Because most fundraising treats the gift as the outcome instead of the beginning. The AFP Fundraising Effectiveness Project's 2024 data puts overall donor retention at 42.6% and first-time donor retention at 19.1%. Donors leave when the experience after the gift does not connect back to the reason they gave in the first place. The joy is there. The follow-through is not.
QWhat is the difference between a donor's motive and a donor's interest?
Interest is the cause area. Motive is the personal reason underneath it. Two donors can both give to a hospital. One is honouring a parent. The other is paying forward care they received at 19. A fundraiser who knows the motive can steward the relationship for a decade. A fundraiser who only knows the interest is one rebrand away from losing the donor.
QHow do I actually surface a donor's motivation in conversation?
Ask one question and stay quiet. 'What made this cause matter to you?' or 'When did you first feel connected to this work?' is enough. Write the answer down inside 24 hours, share it with whoever stewards the relationship next, and reference it by the next touchpoint. Most donors have never been asked. The question itself is the relationship-builder.
QDoes this apply to small gifts or only major donors?
It applies to everyone, with different operational shapes. A modest monthly donor will not get a coffee meeting, but they can get a welcome series that names the motive they selected at sign-up, an annual impact note tied to that motive, and a survey question that lets them update it. The principle scales. The tactics change.
Related questions
About the author and our standards
Major Gifts Officer, SA Philanthropy
Dr Hodan Mohamed is a Major Gifts Officer at SA Philanthropy. She works with principal and major donors on the motivations behind significant gifts, and on the stewardship that keeps those relationships going.
This article was reviewed by the SA Philanthropy editorial team before publication. We source every statistic, name every author, date every update, and correct errors on request. Read our editorial policy.
